ImageBench

AI Image Model Benchmark Leaderboard

Benchmark V1.2 · Ranked by pass rate on 192 prompts

81 models ranked by Overall — capability (graded pass/fail by VLM judges across 192 prompts in six categories) blended 50/50 with aesthetic Estimated Preference. Every generated image is published so you can judge with your own eyes.

V1.2 Leaderboard

Click any model to see every image it generated, or open two models to compare them side-by-side.

Don't take this ranking as the final word. Overall blends an automated VLM judge with an aesthetic preference model — both can be wrong, and neither replaces your own eyes. Every image every model generated is published, so look at them and form your own opinion. Browse the gallery.

81/81
#
1openai/gpt-image-2.5-sunburst
82.1
88.0%16.9s
2openai/gpt-image-2.5-flare
81.5
86.5%13.2s
3openai/gpt-image-2
80.0
87.0%45.3s
4xai/grok-imagine-2
75.4
79.2%69.0s
5fal/google/nano-banana-2
74.9
77.1%28.1s
6fal/reve/2.1
74.8
79.7%45.0s
7fal/google/nano-banana-pro
68.8
78.6%23.4s
8fal/bytedance/seedream-v5-pro
68.0
75.0%147.4s
9fal/microsoft/mai-image-2.5
68.0
69.3%25.4s
10fal/qwen-image-2-pro
66.9
75.5%12.8s
11local/ming-image-0.1-design-6b
64.9
61.5%12.4s
12local/sensenova-u1.5-8b-mot-base
64.8
70.3%44.1s
13local/boogu-image-turbo
64.3
62.0%9.9s
14local/sensenova-u1.5-8b-mot-8step
64.0
63.5%4.1s
15bfl/flux-2-pro
62.2
67.2%11.8s
16fal/bytedance/seedream-v4
62.2
68.2%14.1s
17replicate/google/imagen-4-ultra
62.0
62.0%14.6s
18fal/luma/uni-1-max
62.0
78.6%88.2s
19bfl/flux-2-max
61.9
67.2%26.7s
20local/moss-image-sft
61.9
66.1%157.8s
21local/flux-3-klein-nvfp4
60.3
64.6%13.7s
22local/qwen-image-2512-20b
59.6
52.1%80.2s
23local/krea-2-turbo
59.1
63.0%73.2s
24local/flux-2-klein-9b
59.0
57.8%8.5s
25local/flux-3-klein-fp8
58.8
60.4%25.2s
26local/flux-3-klein-bf16
58.6
59.9%19.6s
27fal/hunyuan-image-3
57.7
52.1%24.4s
28fal/hidream-o1-image-8b
57.7
52.6%19.4s
29bfl/flux-2-klein-9b
57.2
57.3%4.1s
30local/krea-2-turbo-no-filter
56.2
58.3%71.5s
31replicate/recraft-ai/recraft-v4
55.5
62.5%9.5s
32local/flux-3-klein-base-nvfp4
55.3
64.1%80.4s
33local/flux-3-klein-base-fp8
54.9
62.5%164.3s
34fal/bytedance/seedream-v5-lite
54.8
76.6%35.5s
35local/qwen-image-2.1-7b-nf4
54.6
64.1%14.6s
36local/flux-2-klein-4b
53.6
52.6%4.5s
37local/flux-3-klein-base-bf16
53.5
60.4%114.1s
38replicate/google/imagen-4-fast
53.0
51.6%5.8s
39local/mgflow-flux2-klein-4b
52.8
43.2%0.8s
40local/kromoss-dmd2
52.7
64.6%18.7s
41local/iris-3b
52.6
53.1%180.3s
42bfl/flux-1-dev
52.0
45.8%10.2s
43bfl/flux-2-klein-4b
51.8
50.5%3.8s
44replicate/minimax/image-01
51.8
50.0%22.4s
45local/kromoss-dmd
51.8
62.5%18.5s
46local/iris-3b-turbo
51.6
47.4%4.2s
47local/sefi-image-5b-base
51.5
62.5%130.6s
48local/z-image-turbo-6b
51.3
52.6%18.1s
49fal/ideogram/v3
50.8
48.4%12.9s
50fal/krea/v2-medium-turbo
50.7
60.9%15.5s
51fal/bria/fast
50.5
56.2%12.4s
52local/sefi-image-5b-rl
50.0
60.9%130.7s
53fal/hidream-o1-image-dev-8b
50.0
46.4%13.0s
54local/mage-flow-turbo
49.9
54.2%4.6s
55local/z-image-6b
49.3
56.8%130.7s
56replicate/leonardoai/lucid-origin
48.8
52.1%8.2s
57fal/krea/v2-medium
48.7
62.5%18.5s
58local/prxpixel-t2i-7b
48.2
46.4%64.7s
59fal/ideogram/v4
48.0
62.0%16.6s
60fal/krea/v2-large
48.0
64.1%30.1s
61bfl/flux-1.1-pro-ultra
48.0
45.3%13.9s
62fal/recraft/v3
47.8
41.1%10.1s
63replicate/google/imagen-4
47.8
46.4%10.3s
64local/kromoss
47.8
61.5%157.6s
65local/bonsai-image-ternary-4b
47.6
45.3%4.1s
66bfl/flux-1.1-pro
47.0
45.8%4.6s
67local/mage-flow-rl
46.8
51.0%20.9s
68local/mage-flow-base
46.0
50.0%30.4s
69local/hidream-i1-full-17b
45.0
40.1%91.3s
70local/krea-2-raw
44.2
61.5%912.2s
71local/sefi-image-5b-turbo
44.0
56.8%5.9s
72replicate/luma/photon
42.6
51.6%11.1s
73local/moss-image-base
39.0
57.3%157.9s
74fal/flux-1-schnell
38.3
37.0%4.1s
75local/nucleus-image-17b-a2b
37.9
44.3%39.1s
76local/sefi-image-2b-turbo
35.2
44.3%3.6s
77local/sana-1.5-1.6b
34.5
34.9%11.1s
78replicate/luma/photon-flash
32.9
45.8%6.4s
79local/tinydit-256
21.5
21.9%0.5s
80local/supra2-img-100m
8.8
14.1%0.5s
81local/tld-101m
8.4
13.0%0.2s

Local model analysis: Quality vs. size

Overall score against model size (billions of parameters) for all 42 models we ran locally on the NVIDIA DGX Spark. The green gradient deepens toward the sweet spot — smaller models that still score highly.

↖ smaller & higher quality203040506070800B4B8B12B16B20BModel size (billions of parameters)Overall scorenucleus-image-17b-a2bz-image-turbo-6bsana-1.5-1.6bqwen-image-2512-20bbonsai-image-ternary-4bhidream-i1-full-17bz-image-6bprxpixel-t2i-7bflux-2-klein-4bflux-2-klein-9bkrea-2-turbokrea-2-rawboogu-image-turbokrea-2-turbo-no-filtersefi-image-2b-turbosefi-image-5b-basesefi-image-5b-rlsefi-image-5b-turbomage-flow-turbomage-flow-rlmage-flow-baseqwen-image-2.1-7b-nf4supra2-img-100mtld-101mming-image-0.1-design-6btinydit-256sensenova-u1.5-8b-mot-8stepsensenova-u1.5-8b-mot-basemgflow-flux2-klein-4biris-3b-turboiris-3bflux-3-klein-nvfp4flux-3-klein-bf16flux-3-klein-fp8flux-3-klein-base-nvfp4flux-3-klein-base-bf16flux-3-klein-base-fp8kromoss-dmd2kromoss-dmdkromossmoss-image-sftmoss-image-base

Local model analysis: Capability vs. speed

Capability (pass rate on 192 prompts) against average generation time per image for the 42 local models, all timed on the same NVIDIA DGX Spark. Time is on a log scale since models range from a fraction of a second to several minutes per image. The green gradient deepens toward the sweet spot: fast models that still pass most prompts.

↖ faster & more capable1020304050607080900.1s0.3s1s3s10s30s1 min5 min20 minAverage time per image (seconds, log scale)Capability (pass rate %)nucleus-image-17b-a2bz-image-turbo-6bsana-1.5-1.6bqwen-image-2512-20bbonsai-image-ternary-4bhidream-i1-full-17bz-image-6bprxpixel-t2i-7bflux-2-klein-4bflux-2-klein-9bkrea-2-turbokrea-2-rawboogu-image-turbokrea-2-turbo-no-filtersefi-image-2b-turbosefi-image-5b-basesefi-image-5b-rlsefi-image-5b-turbomage-flow-turbomage-flow-rlmage-flow-baseqwen-image-2.1-7b-nf4supra2-img-100mtld-101mming-image-0.1-design-6btinydit-256sensenova-u1.5-8b-mot-8stepsensenova-u1.5-8b-mot-basemgflow-flux2-klein-4biris-3b-turboiris-3bflux-3-klein-nvfp4flux-3-klein-bf16flux-3-klein-fp8flux-3-klein-base-nvfp4flux-3-klein-base-bf16flux-3-klein-base-fp8kromoss-dmd2kromoss-dmdkromossmoss-image-sftmoss-image-base

API model analysis: Quality vs. price

Overall score against API price per image for the 34 hosted models with a published flat per-image price. The green gradient deepens toward the sweet spot — cheaper models that still score highly.

↖ cheaper & higher quality20406080100$0.00$0.04$0.08$0.12$0.16API price per image (USD)Overall scorebfl/flux-2-klein-4bbfl/flux-2-klein-9bbfl/flux-2-probfl/flux-2-maxgoogle/nano-banana-2google/nano-banana-proideogram/v3hidream-o1-image-8bhidream-o1-image-dev-8bbytedance/seedream-v4krea/v2-largekrea/v2-mediumbria/fastrecraft/v3bytedance/seedream-v5-probytedance/seedream-v5-litemicrosoft/mai-image-2.5replicate/google/imagen-4replicate/google/imagen-4-fastreplicate/google/imagen-4-ultrareplicate/luma/photonreplicate/luma/photon-flashreplicate/minimax/image-01replicate/recraft-ai/recraft-v4reve/2.1hunyuan-image-3luma/uni-1-maxreplicate/leonardoai/lucid-originqwen-image-2-proxai/grok-imagine-2bfl/flux-1-devbfl/flux-1.1-probfl/flux-1.1-pro-ultraflux-1-schnell